Insurance Coverage for Cyber Security Losses.

June 17, 2009

I’ve written a white paper titled “Insurance Coverage for Cyber Security Losses.” The white paper discusses, among other things, potential sources of insurance coverage for cyber security claims (including data breaches and more) and new types of insurance that policyholders might consider for cyber security issues. If you would like to receive a copy of the White Paper, please e-mail me.

Disclaimer:

This blog is for informational purposes only. This may be considered attorney advertising in some states. The opinions on this blog do not necessarily reflect those of the author’s law firm and/or the author’s past and/or present clients. By reading it, no attorney-client relationship is formed. If you want legal advice, please retain an attorney licensed in your jurisdiction. The opinions expressed here belong only the individual contributor(s). © All rights reserved. 2009.

myspace profile views counter


Conflicts, mediation, and contingent business interruption insurance.

April 10, 2009

Attorney-mediator Victoria Pynchon recently posted that “you must create disputes to resolve conflicts.”  And from there, she cites my post about contingent business interruption insurance coverage.  Vickie explains that ADR professional should not see all conflicts as bad:

Most people think ADR professionals believe that all conflicts are bad. Quite the contrary.  Those of us who are trained and practiced in dispute resolution understand that conflict must ripen into one or more disputes for society to evolve along the arc of justice.

She continues, explaining that:

To “make room” for those “contradictory forces” we often must raise a ruckus or ask for something we never believed we might be entitled to.  Say, gay marriage.

She concludes by citing to my post about contingent business interruption insurance coverage.  How does she get there?  She reminds corporate policyholders that decades ago:

Corporations once had a cozy, apparently non-conflictual relationship with their carriers because no one questioned the carriers when they said a claim wasn’t covered.

Corporate policyholders, however, would be well-advised to consider closely an insurer’s denial of coverage.  Vickie  concludes that her “stream of consciousness” took her on the path to my post, which explains what contingent business interruption insurance is, and why “In insurance coverage litigation regarding contingent business interruption losses, it is important to turn a critical eye on insurers’ arguments if they have denied coverage.”

myspace profile views counter

Disclaimer:

This blog is for informational purposes only. This may be considered attorney advertising in some states. The opinions on this blog do not necessarily reflect those of the author’s law firm and/or the author’s past and/or present clients. By reading it, no attorney-client relationship is formed. If you want legal advice, please retain an attorney licensed in your jurisdiction. The opinions expressed here belong only the individual contributor(s). © All rights reserved. 2009.


Ensuring Contingent Business Interruption Coverage

April 9, 2009

Today, Insurance Law360 published a piece that I wrote regarding contingent business interruption coverage.  Are you wondering what is contingent business interruption insurance, and whether your business needs it?  I gave an overview of the coverage in the article:

First, an overview of contingent business interruption coverage. “Regular business-interruption insurance replaces profits lost as a result of physical damage to the insured’s plant or other equipment; contingent business-interruption coverage goes further, protecting the insured against the consequences of suppliers’ problems.” Archer Daniels Midland Co. v. Hartford Fire Ins. Co., 243 F.3d 369, 371 (7th Cir. 2001) (“Archer v. Hartford”).

Often times, however, when policyholders ask their insurers to cover losses stemming from contingent business interruption, the insurers refuse, asserting that there must have been a “total cessation” of business operations.  Insurers consistently argue that if there was no “total cessation” of business operations, they are not obligated to provide contingent business interruption coverage.  The insurers’ arguments, however, are wrong.  As I conclude in the article (advice that applies to many situations in which insurers have denied coverage for claims for their corporate policyholders):

In insurance coverage litigation regarding contingent business interruption losses, it is important to turn a critical eye on insurers’ arguments if they have denied coverage.

For the full article, click on over to Insurance Law360.com.

myspace profile views counter

Disclaimer:

This blog is for informational purposes only. This may be considered attorney advertising in some states. The opinions on this blog do not necessarily reflect those of the author’s law firm and/or the author’s past and/or present clients. By reading it, no attorney-client relationship is formed. If you want legal advice, please retain an attorney licensed in your jurisdiction. The opinions expressed here belong only the individual contributor(s). © All rights reserved. 2009.


Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 1,353 other followers